Flagship National Bank of Broward County v. Hinkle
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ZEHMER, Judge.
The issue in this workers’ compensation case is whether the deputy commissioner erred in apportioning medical benefits between the carrier when claimant’s first industrial accident occurred and the carrier at the time of claimant’s second industrial accident. Finding no error, we affirm.
On March 1, 1983, claimant was employed by Flagship National Bank of Bro-ward County (Flagship). While on the job she slipped and fell, injuring her right knee. She missed five days of work and received conservative treatment from Dr. Hammerman. In September 1983 claimant sustained a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hayward Trucking, Inc. v. Aetna Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Rowe & Mitchell v. RodgersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Structural Systems, Inc. v. WorthenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Seasons From Sarasota v. O'DAYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Hayward Trucking v. Aetna Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Atkins Const. Co. v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Cruise Quality Painting v. PaigeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Lemus v. Industrial Sites ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Sauer Indus. Contracting Inc. v. DitchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- City of Fernandina Beach v. School Board of Nassau CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.