The PEOPLE v. Jones
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice House
We have granted defendant’s petition for leave to appeal from the decision of the Appellate Court, Fifth District, affirming his conviction for theft (76 Ill. App. 2d 20), in order to determine whether that court properly permitted defendant’s appointed appellate counsel to withdraw from the case.
In the recent case of Anders v. State of California, the Supreme Court stated, “* * * if counsel finds his [defendant’s] case to be wholly frivolous, after a conscientious examination of it, he [counsel] should so advise the court and request permission to withdraw. That request must, however, be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- The People v. MyersIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
3Cited by22 opinions
- Herbster v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- People v. OuryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Mark Wilkinson v. Roger D. Cowan, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- People v. HackettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. MartinezAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.