Legal Opinion

Schaghticoke Indian Tribe v. Rost

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 18, 2012No. AC 33374PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROBINSON, J.

The self-represented defendant in this summary process eviction action, Michael J. Rost, appeals from the trial court’s judgment of possession rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, the Schaghticoke Indian Tribe (SIT) and the Schaghticoke Tribal Nation (STN). The defendant claims that the court improperly *206(1) exercised jurisdiction by adjudicating a summary process action involving sovereign reservation land, (2) decided a dispute over tribal leadership, (3) rendered judgment without one of the plaintiffs being represented at the summary process trial and (4) ignored prior…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lampasona v. JacobsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Kizis v. Morse Diesel International, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. Golden Hill Paugussett Tribe of Indians v. Town of SouthburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Ryan v. CerulloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Electric Capital Corp. v. Metz Family Enterprises, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Gustafson v. PoitraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API