Snohomish County v. T.A.H.-L.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCox, C.J.
T.A.H.-L. (H.-L.) appeals her involuntary 90-day civil commitment under chapter 71.05 RCW. We hold that a person who is the subject of a petition for involuntary commitment under this chapter has a statutory right to the effective assistance of counsel. The standard by which we review the effectiveness of counsel is that set forth in Strickland v. Washington.1 In this case, the performance of counsel for H.-L. was neither deficient nor prejudicial. We affirm.
H.-L. has a significant history of mental illness and at least 12 prior hospitalizations for mental problems, including 3 at Western…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Grado v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
- In re the Care & Treatment of OntiberosSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. StoutCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- In re BraddySupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
- In Re Detention of StoutCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.