Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 6, 1991, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving a trade readjustment allowance under the Trade Act of 1974 because his separation from employment was not because of lack of work.

The Federal Department of Labor certified the employer’s workers as eligible to apply for trade readjustment allowance (hereinafter TRA) benefits if they became totally or partially separated from their employment. This certification was pursuant to the Trade Act of 1974 (see, 19 USC § 2101 et seq.) and was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HodgesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. In re the Claim of AbbottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. In re GagnierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. In re the Claims of BrandonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of TodaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of WillettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API