Legal Opinion

In Re African-American Slave Descendants Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 26, 2004No. MDL 1491, No. 02 C 7764PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is Defendants’ Joint Motion to Dismiss. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case arises out of the institution of human chattel slavery as it existed in the North American colonies and the latter-formed United States of America. The allegations in Plaintiffs’ First Amended and Consolidated Complaint (“FACC” or “Complaint”) retell the generally acknowledged horrors of the institution of slavery, and the malignant actions of the sovereigns, entities and individuals that supported that institution.…

2Cases cited118 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alperin v. Vatican BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  3. In Re African-American Slave Descendants LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  4. Alperin v. Vatican BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Alperin v. VaticanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API