Legal Opinion

Nicholson v. Doyle

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 5, 1966No. 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

The trial court absolved the defendants from responsibility for damage to plaintiffs’ cellar, brought about through three episodes of flooding. The source of the trouble was the overflowing waters of a small brook which ran through the rear of the plaintiffs’ property, then crossed the defendants’ lot, to exit through a twenty-four inch culvert under Terrace Street, in Montpelier. At times of high rains this culvert would not take care of the run-off and water would back, up behind Terrace Street.

The significant findings of the trial court may be briefly summarized. The lots of the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  2. Little v. LittleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
  3. White River Chair Co. v. Connecticut River Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  4. Savard v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  5. McGrath v. HainesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Canton v. Graniteville Fire District No. 4Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. Scanlan v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  3. Swanson v. Bishop Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Lussier v. ArmstrongVermont Superior Court · 2004
  5. Watson v. WilkinsonVermont Superior Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API