Legal Opinion

Keil v. Seaman

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 11, 1970No. Civ. No. 70-25PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Andrew F. Keil, a private in the United States Army, seeks to be discharged from the Army as a conscientious objector pursuant to Department of Defense Directive No. 1300.6 and Army Regulation 635-20. On September 17, 1969, Keil filed his application for a 1-0 classification as a conscientious objector. That application was disapproved on November 8, 1969.

Keil was born and raised as a Roman Catholic, the faith of his mother. He was educated in Catholic schools on the elementary, secondary and college levels, graduating from Fordham University in June, 1968.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SeegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. United States v. John Douglas BroylesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  3. John Harris Fleming v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  4. Reitemeyer v. McCreaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1969

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. ConnellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1970
  2. Nachand v. SeamanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1971
  3. Font v. LairdDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1970
  4. KANAI v. GerenDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API