Le Fleur v. Vergilia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Memorandum: We think that a plaintiff who has been licensed by the State of New York to operate a motor vehicle and who voluntarily accompanies a defendant, who has just received a learner’s permit, in defendants. ear for the purpose of teaching the defendant to drive, assumes the risk of the defendant’s inexperience and may not recover damages for personal injuries caused by the lack of skill or inexperience of the defendant and that it was error for the court to fail so…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Ingersoll v. Onondaga Hockey Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- McEvoy v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Eisenhut v. EisenhutWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- McEvoy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Corbett v. CurtisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Spellman v. SpellmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Aloisio v. NelsonNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Edwards v. PickensNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Braatz v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.