Wong Nin v. City and County
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
COKE, C. J.
Plaintiff, through his counsel, has interposed herein a petition' for a rehearing basing his application on the ground that this court erred in its definition of “valid, legal claim” as the term is used in Act 194, L. 1931, as amended, plaintiff contending that the court overlooked the established rule that a claim barred by the statute of limitations does not lose its character as a valid, legal claim since the remedy only is barred and that upon the removal of the obstacle by the repeal of the statute the claim may be prosecuted in the same way as it might…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eingartner v. Illinois Steel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Scott v. PilipoHawaii Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anderson v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998
- Kam v. State of Hawaii Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
- Weidenbach v. Koolau Agricultural Co., Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009