Legal Opinion

Wong Nin v. City and County

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1935No. 2198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

COKE, C. J.

Plaintiff, through his counsel, has interposed herein a petition' for a rehearing basing his application on the ground that this court erred in its definition of “valid, legal claim” as the term is used in Act 194, L. 1931, as amended, plaintiff contending that the court overlooked the established rule that a claim barred by the statute of limitations does not lose its character as a valid, legal claim since the remedy only is barred and that upon the removal of the obstacle by the repeal of the statute the claim may be prosecuted in the same way as it might…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eingartner v. Illinois Steel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Scott v. PilipoHawaii Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Kam v. State of Hawaii Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
  3. Weidenbach v. Koolau Agricultural Co., Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API