Schatz v. REPUBLICAN STATE LEADERSHIP COMMITTEE
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
Introduction
Elections unsurprisingly are often rough-and-tumble events. But candidates become justifiably outraged when they are falsely accused, especially when the close date of the election prevents an effective rebuttal, and especially when the accusation is made not even by the opponent but by relatively anonymous outsiders. Nevertheless, in the service of robust public discourse, the First Amendment protects statements made in a campaign even if they turn out to be false — unless the speaker knows the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schatz v. Republican State Leadership CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- GILLESPIE v. CIGNA HEALTH MANAGEMENT INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2025