Legal Opinion

Price v. Guy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 1999PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

This Court granted allocatur in order to determine whether, in a negligence action, a trial court may inform the jury that the plaintiffs elected the limited tort option in a motor vehicle insurance policy and that such election resulted in their paying lower premiums. For the reasons that follow, we find that the trial court committed an error of law in instructing the jury regarding this information, and that appellants suffered prejudice as a result of this error. Accordingly, we reverse the Superior Court’s affirmance of the trial court’s judgment.

On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Washington v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Washington v. BaxterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Lockhart v. ListSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Vignoli v. Standard Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Quinby v. Plumsteadville Family Practice, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Betz v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Zauflik, A., Aplt. v. Pennsbury School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API