Legal Opinion
Bell v. Parry
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 23, 2010No. 10-CA-369PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge.
1 ?The plaintiff, Naykea Bell, 1 has appealed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance Company. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
FACTS
Dr. Samuel Parry performed breast augmentation surgery on the plaintiff on September 27, 2003 and January 13, 2005. On January 11, 2007, plaintiff filed a petition for damages alleging that in June 2005 she discovered that Dr. Parry made errors in these surgeries, requiring her to undergo corrective surgery by another physician. Plaintiff alleged that she had filed a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holmes v. HendricksLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- Hood v. CotterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Anderson v. IchinoseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Craig v. Bantek West, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Marigny v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
3Cited by21 opinions
- Pouncy v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Upton v. Rouse's Enterprise, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Boutin v. Roman Catholic Church of the Diocese of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Dorsey v. Purvis Contracting Grp., LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Darr v. Marine Electronics Solutions, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.