People v. Bull
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, a motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 would not have been successful, and defendant
*837therefore was not denied the right to effective assistance of counsel by the failure of assigned counsel to make such a motion (see, People v Ayala, 236 AD2d 802, lv denied 90 NY2d 855; People v Torrence, 135 AD2d 1075, lv denied 70 NY2d 1011). We further reject the contention of defendant that he was denied the right to a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct on summation. Defendant failed to preserve for our…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. HalmNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. AyalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. DunbarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. TorrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. McDuffieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007