Legal Opinion

People v. Bull

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 1, 1999No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, a motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 would not have been successful, and defendant

*837therefore was not denied the right to effective assistance of counsel by the failure of assigned counsel to make such a motion (see, People v Ayala, 236 AD2d 802, lv denied 90 NY2d 855; People v Torrence, 135 AD2d 1075, lv denied 70 NY2d 1011). We further reject the contention of defendant that he was denied the right to a fair trial by prosecutorial misconduct on summation. Defendant failed to preserve for our…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. HalmNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. People v. AyalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. People v. DunbarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. TorrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. McDuffieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API