Legal Opinion

Newell Contracting Co. v. McConnell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 22, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

On September 25, 1920, appellant company executed its negotiable promissory note of that -date, dua December 10th after date, for $2,500, to tbe order of H. A. Morrison; and this is a suit to collect it. Tbe note was dated at' Earle, Arkansas, and was payable at tbe Bank of Commerce in that city. Tbe plaintiff is tbe receiver of the People’s Bank & Trust Company, a defunct banking- corporation of Memphis, Tennessee. Tbe execution of tbe note by appellant is admitted, but a failure of consideration is alleged, and the answer further recites that tbe bank was not an innocent bolder of tbe note.

T…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Exchange National Bank v. CoeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Miles v. DodsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Haldiman v. TaftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Exchange National Bank v. SteeleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  5. Hayes v. BishopSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Titan Oil & Gas, Inc. v. ShipleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  2. Citizens Bank, Booneville, Arkansas v. National Bank of Commerce, Tulsa, OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  3. Henry v. Union Sawmill CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  4. J. I. Porter Lumber Company v. BonnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Southern Surety Co. v. Pfeifer Stone Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API