Legal Opinion

Williams v. Vonderau

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 2, 2007No. COA05-1549PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*19WYNN, Judge.

“A case is considered moot when a determination is sought on a matter which, when rendered, cannot have any practical effect on the existing controversy.”1 Here, Defendant appeals from a Chapter 50C Civil No-Contact Order, effective 7 April 2005 for a period of one year. The appeal was heard before this Court 12 September 2006, almost five months after the order ceased to be effective. For this reason, we find the issue is moot and accordingly dismiss.

The facts of the case were that at an 8 April 2005 hearing on this matter, Plaintiff James Williams testified that on 15 February…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Lange v. LangeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State Ex Rel. Rhodes v. GaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. VonderauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API