Legal Opinion

Williams v. Vonderau

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 2, 2007No. COA05-1549Published

1Opinion of the Court

638 S.E.2d 644 (2007)

James WILLIAMS, Plaintiff,

v.

Christopher VONDERAU, Defendant.

No. COA05-1549.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

January 2, 2007.

James E. Williams, Wilmington, plaintiff-appellee.

Bruce A. Mason and Samantha K. Stokes, Wilmington, for defendant-appellant.

WYNN, Judge.

"A case is considered moot when a determination is sought on a matter which, when rendered, cannot have any practical effect on the existing controversy."[1] Here, Defendant appeals from a Chapter 50C Civil No-Contact Order, effective 7 April 2005 for a period of one year. The appeal was heard before this Court 12…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Kinsey v. SpannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Lange v. LangeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Boney Publishers, Inc. v. Burlington City CouncilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Young v. LicaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API