Williams v. Vonderau
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
638 S.E.2d 644 (2007)
James WILLIAMS, Plaintiff,
v.
Christopher VONDERAU, Defendant.
No. COA05-1549.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina.
January 2, 2007.
James E. Williams, Wilmington, plaintiff-appellee.
Bruce A. Mason and Samantha K. Stokes, Wilmington, for defendant-appellant.
WYNN, Judge.
"A case is considered moot when a determination is sought on a matter which, when rendered, cannot have any practical effect on the existing controversy."[1] Here, Defendant appeals from a Chapter 50C Civil No-Contact Order, effective 7 April 2005 for a period of one year. The appeal was heard before this Court 12…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- Kinsey v. SpannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Lange v. LangeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- Boney Publishers, Inc. v. Burlington City CouncilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Young v. LicaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.