Legal Opinion

United States v. Arnold

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided May 30, 1984No. CM 442627PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

COKER, Judge:

Appellant was charged with committing indecent liberties and attempted carnal knowledge of his thirteen year old daughter in violation of Articles 134 and 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 934 and 880 (1976), and of rape of a fellow soldier in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 920 (1976). He pleaded not guilty to all charges, but was found guilty by a general court-martial of officer and enlisted members of the indecent liberties offense. The confinement portion of his adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. UrbinaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. ArnoldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. BarrorU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  3. United States v. WhitneyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. RousseauU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API