Legal Opinion

United States v. Russell A. Werme

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 27, 1991No. 90-1485PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

A jury found Russell Werme guilty of conspiracy to violate the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1952(a)(3). Werme’s conviction was based on bribes he and Eugene Brault paid when they ran and managed B & B Insulation Company. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We will affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

United Engineers and Constructors (“United”) was the primary contractor on the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant construction project in Seabrook, New Hampshire. B & B, a subsidiary of Insulco, Inc., desired to participate in the Seabrook project as a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. AbelSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. State v. CaldwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. McGloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. Vincent R. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. MaliszewskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API