Legal Opinion
Saneil v. Robards
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided October 30, 2003No. Civil Action 3:01CV-171-HPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN, Chief Judge.
This Court now considers a number of motions, all of which address whether the Arbitration Award dated December 26, 2002, and the Supplement to the Arbitration Award (collectively the “Award”) dated February 19, 2003, should be confirmed, vacated, or modified. On May 24, 2001, this Court compelled arbitration of all issues in this case, including fraudulent inducement of the contract. See Saneii v. Robards, 187 F.Supp.2d 710 (W.D.Ky.2001). The Court also entered an Amended Order holding the case in abeyance until the arbitrator had reached a decision on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Manuel KAPLAN; Carol Kaplan; MK Investments, Inc., Appellants, v. FIRST OPTIONS OF CHICAGO, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Daniel v. Green v. Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- U.S. Home Corp. v. Michael Ballesteros TrustNevada Supreme Court · 2018
- Garlock v. 3DS Props., L. L.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019