Matter of Will of Ricks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
The principal question on this appeal is whether it was a violation of General Statute^S-51 1 and error prejudicial to the caveators to permit the propounder to testify to certain personal transactions and communications between the witness and the deceased relating to the execution of the script sought to be propounded. A majority of the Court of Appeals’ panel thought it was, on the ground that this testimony tended to prove “facts essential to establish the will as the voluntary act of the testador and rebut the charge of undue influence . . . . ” The majority further ruled…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Smith v. . KellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- In Re HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- In Re Will of HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- McLeary v. . NormentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- In Re Will of ChismanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hardee v. HardeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Caudill v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- In Re the Will of CampbellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Meadows v. MeadowsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of Will of SimmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.