Legal Opinion

Matter of Will of Simmons

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 2, 1979No. 7825SC1044PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

By various assignments of error, based on numerous exceptions noted in the record, caveators attack the admission of certain testimony of the witnesses Pitts, Townsend and Hedrick. Caveators argue that their testimony was hearsay and in violation of the “Dead Man’s” statute, G.S. § 8-51. They contend that the hearsay rule operates to exclude certain of this testimony because such testimony was offered solely to prove the truth of declarations made by decedent before and after execution of the purported will. Furthermore, caveators assert that the provisions of G.S. § 8-51…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  2. In Re Will of HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. March v. . VerbleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. In Re the Will of ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Hodges v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of Will of HesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Whitley v. ColtraneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. In the Matter of Will of ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. In Re the Will of YelvertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. In the Matter of Will of ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API