United States Ex Rel. Wright v. Peters
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BAKER, District Judge.
This death penalty habeas corpus matter is before the court on the petitioner’s motion to stay the proceedings and hold them in abeyance pending state court consideration of his unexhausted claims. The petitioner contends that two recent Illinois state court decisions will allow him a second post-conviction proceeding. The respondents counter with a motion to dismiss the petition outright under Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 102 S.Ct. 1198, 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982), as it is a mixed petition containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims. The parties therefore agree…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. VaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Rufus A. Averhart v. Robert Farley and Indiana Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994