Lott v. Mitchell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Second Judicial District, •Butte County. The defendants appealed from the judgment. The other facts are" stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Shafter, J.:
The complaint alleges that Mitchell brought an action of replevin against Morris and another, and that the property described in the complaint and affidavit was seized by W. D. Middleton, Sheriff of Butte County. That one Ellsworth gave due notice to said Sheriff, under the one hundred and ninth section of the Practice Act, that the property was his, and that thereupon Middleton demanded of Mitchell a bond of indemnity, which demand was complied with. The undertaking was signed by Mitchell, Root and. Haun, and was conditioned that Mitchell “ should well and truly…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Willson v. McEvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Prader v. GrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Love v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1810
3Cited by1 opinion
- (PC) Wilson v. High Desert State PrisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025