Pentz v. Burrowes
Cuyahoga Circuit Court
Eeror to Cuyahoga common pleas court. Statutes cited and construed. Revised Statutes 4269, 4270, 4271, 4272, 4276, 5006, 5058, 6352 (Lan. 7045, 7046, 7047. 7048, 7052. 8521, 8573, 9928). ■Whether plaintiff in one action may recover judgment against a partnership and for allowance against the assignee. Green & Kelley’s Ohio Practice 18, 27, 40, 62, 123 et seq., citing Neilson v. Fry, 16 Ohio St. 552 [91 Am.
Read the full summary
Eeror to Cuyahoga common pleas court. Statutes cited and construed. Revised Statutes 4269, 4270, 4271, 4272, 4276, 5006, 5058, 6352 (Lan. 7045, 7046, 7047. 7048, 7052. 8521, 8573, 9928). ■Whether plaintiff in one action may recover judgment against a partnership and for allowance against the assignee. Green & Kelley’s Ohio Practice 18, 27, 40, 62, 123 et seq., citing Neilson v. Fry, 16 Ohio St. 552 [91 Am. Dee. 110]; Jones v. Timmons, 21 Ohio St. 596; Bethel v- Woochvorth, 11 Ohio St. 393; Dixon v. Caldwell, 15 Ohio St. 412 [86 Am. Dec. 487]; O’Neal v. Blessing, 34 Ohio St. 33; Lamson v.…
1Opinion of the CourtMarvin, J.
The parties here are as they, were below. Suit was brought by the plaintiff!' against Frederick J. Johnson ' and others as partners >under the firm name of Johnson, Walther & Co., George B. Burrowes as as-signee of said firm, and Levi T. Schofield.
The petition alleges that Johnson, Walther & Co. carried on a. gambling business in rooms owned and leased to them by said Schofield,, and that said business was so carried on with the full knowledge of said Schofield, ’ who took no steps to recover the premises from said firm; that the plaintiff lost in gambling at said gambling rooms and paid, to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Howe v. PeckhamNew York Supreme Court · 1851
- Robinson v. FlintNew York Supreme Court · 1858
- Badger v. BenedictNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1857