In re the Marriage of Thomas
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
Wife appeals from a trial court judgment modifying a dissolution judgment by reducing husband’s spousal support obligation. On de novo review, we modify the spousal support award.
The parties were married for 23 years. They have three children: 21-year-old twins and a 22-year-old daughter, all of whom were attending college at the time of the modification hearing. Wife, who was 50 years old at the time of the modification hearing, is a dietician. Husband, who was 54 years old at the time of the hearing, is an ear, nose, and throat doctor. The parties’ dissolution judgment was entered in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Marriage of BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In re the Marriage of TomosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- In re the Marriage of MaierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- In re the Marriage of CowdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Marriage of VandenbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- In re the Marriage of AaroeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- In re the Marriage of MedlynCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004