Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Thomas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 1, 2002No. 9606-66962; A111019PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Wife appeals from a trial court judgment modifying a dissolution judgment by reducing husband’s spousal support obligation. On de novo review, we modify the spousal support award.

The parties were married for 23 years. They have three children: 21-year-old twins and a 22-year-old daughter, all of whom were attending college at the time of the modification hearing. Wife, who was 50 years old at the time of the modification hearing, is a dietician. Husband, who was 54 years old at the time of the hearing, is an ear, nose, and throat doctor. The parties’ dissolution judgment was entered in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In re the Marriage of TomosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. In re the Marriage of MaierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. In re the Marriage of CowdenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of VandenbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. In re the Marriage of AaroeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. In re the Marriage of MedlynCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API