In re the Marriage of Vandenberg
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.
In this proceeding for modification of a judgment of dissolution of marriage, ORS 107.135,1 wife appeals the trial court’s order denying her motion to make her award of spousal support indefinite rather than for 10 years. On de novo review, we find that wife has failed to meet her burden of proving a substantial and unanticipated change in circumstances. We therefore affirm.
We state the facts of this case mindful of the trial court’s express and implied findings of credibility. Tomos and Tomos, 165 Or App 82, 87, 995 P2d 576 (2000). The trial court found husband to be an “extremely credible”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Marriage of TomosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- In re the Marriage of BarronCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Grayson v. GraysonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- In re the Marriage of PoletteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- In re the Marriage of EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Marriage of DeboerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007