Legal Opinion

In Re Donald Pearson

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 16, 1993No. 92-2158PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Circuit Judge.

Petitioners seek a writ of mandamus which, if granted, will halt the district court’s nascent efforts to probe the continuing need for, or the possible modification of, consent decrees affecting the operation of a state institution, the Massachusetts Treatment Center for Sexually Dangerous Persons (the Treatment Center). Because petitioners cannot satisfy the strict prerequisites for extraordinary relief by way of mandamus, we dismiss the petition.

I. BACKGROUND

The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts has been involved with the Treatment Center…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard A. HornCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  2. In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. In Re Providence Journal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  4. Brewster v. DukakisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Town of Norwood v. New England Power Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API