Legal Opinion

Martin v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 31, 2004No. 01-03-01111-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JANE BLAND, Justice.

Appellant Connie Martin moved for sanctions against appellee, the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS), 1 alleging that the lawsuit the DFPS had filed against her was frivolous. The same day, the DFPS moved to nonsuit its claims against Martin, and the trial court granted the motion. Thereafter, Martin sought discovery against the DFPS. The DFPS responded by filing a plea to the jurisdiction, contending that the trial court had, by then, lost plenary power over the case. The trial court granted the DFPS’s plea and this appeal followed. We…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lane Bank Equipment Co. v. Smith Southern Equipment, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Mapco, Inc. v. ForrestTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State Ex Rel. Latty v. OwensTexas Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Unifund CCR Partners v. VillaTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Royal Independent School District v. Ragsdale, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  3. Mantri v. Bergman, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
  4. in Re Kenny Bates Dba Bates Backhoe Service, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  5. Xiaodong Li v. DDX Group Investment, LLC D/B/A Dong Ting Chinese Restaurant, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API