Legal Opinion
Prescott v. Farquhar
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 4, 1936No. Civ. 1593PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SCOVEL, J., pro tem.
In about the month of September, 1930, plaintiffs herein filed an action in claim and delivery against one Ray Dillingham, praying for the recovery of cer-' tain personal property then in the possession of said defendant or for the value thereof in case a delivery could.not be had, together with damages for the detention thereof.
The plaintiffs in said action made the affidavit, requisition and bond as provided in sections 510, 511 and 512 of the Code of Civil Procedure. These documents were delivered to J. A. Rivera, constable of Redlands Township, who was also a special…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kruger v. California Highway Indemnity ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. BartschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Prescott v. FarquharCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by1 opinion
- Glens Falls Insurance Company v. Murray Plumbing and Heating Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964