State ex rel. Wingenter v. Circuit Court for Walworth County
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
The first contention of the respondents is that this is not a case for the exercise of the supervisory power through a writ of prohibition. We deem this contention to be without merit. The issues upon the original writ of habeas corpus were fully litigated, and the petitioner vested with control and custody of his minor daughter. It is now proposed to open up these proceedings and to stay them. Petitioner contends that the court is without jurisdiction to do this, and that the stay will result in depriving him, at least for a time, of the custody of his child and thus' of the entire fruits of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Hustisford Light, Power & Manufacturing Co. v. GrimmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- State ex rel. De Puy v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Comstock v. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Turner v. NachtsheimWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Potter v. FrohbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barbian v. Lindner Bros. Trucking Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Chinchilla Ranch, Inc. v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Yanggen v. Wisconsin Michigan Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Harris v. GollinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Zbikowski v. StrazWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.