Legal Opinion

Adams v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1988No. 87-3784PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

In this diversity action, plaintiffs-appellants Mary G. Adams, Frank H. Adams, Fred M. Adams, (the Adams family) and Gloria A. Waters, David Waters, Teri Thompson, and Dennis Waters (the Waters family) (collectively plaintiffs) appeal from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants-appel-lees Armstrong World Industries, GAF Corp., Celotex Corp., Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Fibreboard Corp., Owens-Coming Fiberglas Corp., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pittsburgh Coming Corp., Turner & Ne-wall PLC, and Raymark Industries, Inc., (collectively…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Richardson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Davis v. MoranIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Jenkins v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 1985
  5. Adams v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adams v. Armstrong World IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API