Legal Opinion

Dino Joseph Bennetti v. Ryan Thornell, et al.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided February 17, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00169Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 7 Dino Joseph Bennetti, 8 Plaintiff CV-25-0169-PHX-DWL (JFM) -vs- 9 Ryan Thornell, et al., Defendants. Report & Recommendation 10 11 I. MATTER UNDER CONSIDERATION 12 Petitioner has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 13

2254 (Doc. 1). The Petitioner's Petition is now ripe for consideration. Accordingly, the 14 undersigned makes the following proposed findings of fact, report, and recommendation 15 pursuant to Rule 8(b), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 72(b), Federal Rules of 16 Civil Procedure,…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API