Legal Opinion

Andraski v. Gormley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

It is the plaintiff’s first contention that the defendant, from the evidence, should have been found negligent as to management and control. Since a new trial is necessary for other reasons no detailed discussion of the evidence is required on this point. However, we will state that the record discloses that the defendant did not see plaintiff's car until he was within a very short distance of it and did not see the plaintiff at all until after the collision. Under the circumstances the defendant was not negligent as a matter of law with respect to management and control.

It is the next…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Long v. SteffenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Callaway v. KryzenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Menge v. MantheyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Kline v. JohannesenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Swanson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Winter v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  2. Melton v. CrottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Hernke v. Northern Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Menard v. Jiffy Self-Service Dry Cleaning, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API