Legal Opinion

State v. Piacella

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1971No. 70-464PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneideR, J.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in not allowing her to withdraw her guilty plea for the reason that at the time of entering her plea she was under a misconception of the nature of the charge and there existed a misrepresentation of the evidence against her.

This court finds from the record that defendant’s guilty plea was not the result of coercion, trickery, deception or intimidation and that it was “voluntarily, intelligently and knowingly made with a complete understanding of the consequences.” North Carolina v. Alford (1970), 400 U. S. 25, 27 L. Ed. 2d 162; Brady v. United…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Wood v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. StoneOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Claude Francis Roddy, Jr. v. Harold E. Black, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State ex rel. LeBlanc v. HendersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API