Legal Opinion
Kathryn A. Piper v. Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 5, 1983No. 82-1548PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
In this challenge to the constitutionality of Rule 42 of the Supreme Court of New Hampshire, the district court found that the rule violated the privileges and immunities clause. 539 F.Supp. 1064 (D.N.H.1982). A divided panel of this court reversed. Upon granting the petition for rehearing en banc, this court vacated the panel’s judgment and withdrew the panel opinion. Upon en banc reconsideration this court is now divided 2-2. Therefore, the decision of the district court is affirmed by an equally divided vote.
We reproduce below the two en banc opinions.
BOWNES and COFFIN, Circuit Judges.
The…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Supreme Court of NH v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Medeiros v. Atlantic States MariCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Enquire Printing & Publishing Co. v. O'ReillySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Schneider v. Colegio De Abogados De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1987
- Gattineri v. Town of Lynnfield, MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.