Legal Opinion

United States v. Stockton Midway Oil Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 5, 1917No. A-54PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the United States against the Stockton Midway Oil Company and others. On application for injunction and for receiver.

1Opinion of the Court

BLEDSOE, District Judge.

This is an application by the plaintiff for an injunction in restraint of waste and for the appointment of -a receiver for oil property claimed by the government in its proprietary capacity, and now in the possession of and being operated for the production of oil by defendants. The case is a so-called “withdrawal suit” and in its substantial features is of the form, scope, and purpose of cases heretofore considered and reported. United States v. McCutchen et al. (D. C.) 234 Fed. 702, same case on final hearing 238 Fed. 575; also United States v. Midway Northern Oil…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Midwest Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Pool v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Miller v. ChrismanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Nevada Sierra Oil Co. v. Home Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
  5. United States v. Midway Northern Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Thirty-Two Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1917
  2. United States v. Dominion Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1917
  3. Consolidated Mut. Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API