Cue v. State

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Christopher M. Cue appeals from a district court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief. The district court made a finding, following an eviden-tiary hearing, that Cue’s credit for time served was properly computed; therefore, Cue is not entitled to a remand under N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-11. Cue has not affirmatively established by the record that he is entitled to additional credit for time served in connection with this case, and the record does not demonstrate the district court’s finding was clearly erroneous. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On May 19, 2000, Cue pled…