Legal Opinion

United States v. Minster Farmers Cooperative Exchange, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 5, 1977No. C 75-127PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

WALINSKI, District Judge.

This cause came to be heard on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, filed pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A stipulation of fact has been filed by the parties, all issues before the Court have been thoroughly briefed, and the matter is now before the Court for a determination.

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

Plaintiff, the United States of America, brings this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1345, to recover the value of certain crops alleged to have been unlawfully converted by the defendant, Minster Farmers Cooperative Exchange, Inc.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles E. Carson, Being the Same Person as Charles Edward Carson, and W. R. Ellis, D/B/A Ellis Livestock Commission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  2. Cassidy Commission Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. McCleskey Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re KruseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1983
  3. Nolin Production Credit Ass'n v. Canmer Deposit BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
  4. National Bank of Fulton County v. Haupricht Bros., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Lemley-Cabbiness Farms v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (In Re Lemley Estate Business Trust)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API