Legal Opinion

Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 9, 1996No. Court No. 95-03-00275PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Wallach, Judge:

Plaintiff Rhone-Poulenc moved pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.2, for judgment on the agency record challenging the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Coumarin From The People’s Republic of China, 59 Fed. Reg. 66895 (Dep’t Comm. 1994)(the “Final Determination”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I

Background

On December 30, 1993, Rhone Poulenc filed a petition with Commerce and the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) alleging that imports of coumarin from the People’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  4. Daewoo Electronics Co., Ltd. And Daewoo Electronics Corp. Of America, Inc., and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. And Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Goldstar Co., Ltd. And Goldstar Electronics International, Inc. v. International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Technical, Salaried and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers of America, Independent Radionic Workers of America and Industrial Union Department, Afl-Cio v. Zenith Electronics Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. Negev Phosphates, Ltd. v. United States Department of CommerceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Olympia Industrial, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  2. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  3. Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Peer Bearing Co. Changshan v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
  5. Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API