Legal Opinion

Sharp v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 11, 1980No. 79-T-99, CA 16667PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Petitioner appeals from a referee’s decision ruling that certain persons who performed services for petitioner were petitioner’s employes, rather than independent contractors, and that the petitioner was therefore liable for unemployment compensation tax payments for the period in question. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The distinction between an employe and an independent contractor for purposes of unemployment insurance is found in ORS 657.040. That statute provides:

"Services performed by am individual for remuneration are deemed to be employment subject to this chapter unless and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. PeetOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Byrne Trucking, Inc. v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Pam's Carpet Service, Inc. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Republic Development Co. v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carpet Mill & Lighthouse v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. AAA Tax Service v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API