Dikeman v. Arnold
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Joseph. (Loveridge, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.
On June 16, 1887, the plaintiffs were the owners oí a farm of 210 acres in Sherwood, Branch county, upon which Richard Dougherty, the father of Orville,' and the father-in-law of Dikeman, held a mortgage of a little over $7,000. •
*659Jasper Shaw and Elsie, his wife, owned two farms,— one of 124J- acres, near Three Rivers, Mich., and the other in Indiana.
The defendant was the owner of a farm adjoining the Shaw farm, near Three Rivers, and was also the owner of several lots in the village of Three Rivers. Upon this farm were good houses and barns, and he had resided thereon with his wife and family…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Allen v. AtkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Pierson v. SpauldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dikeman v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Flynn v. FlynnIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Poole v. Consolidated Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Frederick v. HillebrandMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Dikeman v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.