Legal Opinion
Broadvue Motors, Inc. v. Maple Hts. Police
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 12, 1999No. 74808PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Spellacy, Judge.
Defendant-appellant, the Chief of Police, city of Maple Heights (“Maple Heights”), appeals from the judgment of the trial court finding that Maple Heights did not follow the proper procedure in declaring a vehicle owned by plaintiff-appellee, Broadvue Motors, Inc., d.b.a. Ganley Lincoln Mercury (“Ganley”) forfeited.
Maple Heights assigns the following errors for review:
“I. The trial court committed reversible error by analyzing appellant’s forfeiture of appellee’s vehicle under R.C. § 4513.63 (junk motor vehicles) when in fact said vehicle was properly forfeited pursuant to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Akro-Plastics v. Drake IndustriesOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Henderson v. Spring Run AllotmentOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Globe American Casualty Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dennie Henry v. City of MiddletownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Ohio Edison Co. v. HouserOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- FabMetals, Inc. v. Stratacache, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Gilliam v. Vaughn's Auto Repair & TowingOhio Court of Appeals · 2019