Legal Opinion

Mendioca v. Orr

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1860PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Santa Cruz. Action for forcible entry, etc. For facts, see opinion. Defendant appeals from the judgment of dismissal.

1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.

Baldwin, J. concurring.

In this case, an appeal from a Justice’s Court to the County Court of Santa Cruz county was dismissed, on the ground that the record did not show that the notice of appeal had been served upon the adverse party. The appellant offered to prove by affidavit that the service had in fact been made, but the Court declined to admit the proof. This was clearly erroneous. The fact of service was the important matter, and it was of no consequence that its existence was not shown by the record. If the service was made, the jurisdiction had attached; and to show that it was made,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dalzell v. Superior Court of San Benito CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Mendini v. MilnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Farmers & Miners State Bank v. ProbstMontana Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API