Legal Opinion
Lee v. Remington Rand, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 16, 1946No. 5545PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARRISON, District Judge.
The petitioner, Jack Owens Lee, has filed a veteran’s petition under the provisions of Section 8(c) of the Selective Training and .Service Act of 1940, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 308(e), through the United States Attorney, wherein he seeks to be restored to his former position with the respondent, Remington Rand, Inc.
The controversy revolves around the question whether the petitioner held a position with respondent or was an independent contractor.
The facts disclose that the petitioner, prior to January 13th, 1941, was employed by respondent as a typewriter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Ryan v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Cook v. BallCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Modern Motors, Inc. v. ElkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- MacMillan v. Montecito Country Club, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- King v. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Karas v. KleinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
- Williams v. DoddsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Hudspeth v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1947
- Republic Life Insurance v. DobsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.