Legal Opinion

Security T. S. Bk. v. New York Indem. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1934No. Docket No. L.A. 14415PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant appeals from a money judgment entered in favor of plaintiff.

The cause went to trial on an agreed statement of facts which may be summarized as follows: At all times material to this action Gordon L. Eby and Lewis H. Homer were attorneys-in-fact for the Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, which for brevity we will refer to as the Indemnity Company, and each was authorized to execute, acknowledge and deliver in the name of the company, indemnity and fidelity bonds and undertakings, including those similar to the one here involved. Homer had offices with and was employed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. World Exchange Bank v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Burr v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Security Trust & Savings Bank v. MatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Trade Bank of New York v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Trade Bk. N.Y. v. U.S. Fid.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Mallinger v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  4. Stover v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  5. Hobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API