Legal Opinion

Hobson v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Assn.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 1950No. Civ. 14396PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

In an action upon a health and accident insurance policy issued by defendant to plaintiff and tried before a jury, the jury found in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $3,730. Plaintiff appealed, on the ground that the amount awarded was less than he was entitled to under the terms of the policy.

Questions Presented

Were the terms of the policy ambiguous and hence extrinsic evidence should have been admitted to interpret them, and if not, was the court’s interpretation correctf

Pacts

The facts are not disputed. On December 2,1941, defendant issued plaintiff, who was then 53 years of age, a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mathews v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. Island v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Burns v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Jones v. Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Taff v. Atlas Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Wildman v. Government Employees Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Crane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
  5. General Casualty Company of America, a Corporation v. Azteca Films, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API