Legal Opinion
Fidel B. Ibarra, Jr. v. Texas Employment Commission v. United States Department of Labor and United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 6, 1987No. 86-2762PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge:
The Texas Employment Commission (TEC) entered into a consent decree with plaintiff class of aliens defining what categories of aliens are “permanently residing in the United States under color of law” and thus eligible to receive unemployment compensation from TEC. See 26 U.S.C. § 3304(a)(14)(A); Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5221b-l(h)(l) (Vernon 1987). Before the district court gave final approval to the decree, the Department of Labor (DOL) •informed TEC that it considered the consent decree inconsistent with federal law and warned that it might institute compliance…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- California v. Grace Brethren ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Adams Extract Co., Great Northern Packaging Corp., Cfs Continental, Inc., Rossville Packing Co., Andre-Boudin Bakeries, Inc., Townhouse Furniture, Denver Meat Co., Carron Manufacturing Co., Ilikon Corp., Wittek Golf Supply Co., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees v. Pleasure Hours, Inc., St. Joe Paper Co., the Continental Group, Olinkraft, Inc., Container Corporation of America, the Chesapeake Corporation of Virginia, Owens-Illinois, Inc., MacMillan Bloedel, Inc., Inland Container Corp., Menasha Corp., U. S. Corrugated Fibre-Box Co., Stone Container Corp., Defendants- Appellants-Appellees. In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Adams Extract Co., Cfs Continental, Inc., Townhouse Furniture, Rossville Packing Co., Denver Meat Co., Carron Manufacturing Co., Andre-Boudin Bakeries, Inc., Ilikon Corp., Great Northern Packaging Corp., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees, Pleasure Hours, Inc., London Dry Ltd., Plaintiffs- Objectors-Appellants-Appellees v. The Chesapeake Corporation of Virginia, Stone Container Corp., Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- St. Martin Evangelical Lutheran Church v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Ehrheart v. Verizon WirelessCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Indigo Williams v. Tate ReevesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Kozlowski v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Midland West Corporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, and Richard E. Anderson, as Substitute TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Saahir v. EstelleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.