Tom Lockerbie, Inc. v. Fruhling
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
GRUBB, District Judge.
The parties to this action for unfair use of trade secrets and infringement of a patent have filed the following motions:
1. Defendants’ motion to drop Frederick Fruhling, named in his individual capacity, as a party to the action; and
2. Plaintiff’s motion to limit the issues in the case and to strike the defenses of invalidity and noninfringement of plaintiff’s patent 2,854,827 relating to the machine in suit.
Pursuant to provisions of the pretrial order entered on February 13, 1961, the parties have agreed to waive oral arguments and to submit the issues presented by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Powder Power Tool Corporation v. Powder Actuated Tool Company, Inc., and Frank J. KlunkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Libbey Glass Mfg. Co. v. Albert Pick Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
- Dynamic Balancing Mach. Co. v. AkimoffDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
- Akimoff v. Dynamic Balancing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922