Legal Opinion

Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Tyner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 29, 1928No. 62PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Reversed and remanded for a new trial on the authority of (1) Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. v. Coogan, 271 U. S. 472; (2) Southern Pacific Co. v. Berkshire, 254 U. S. 415; Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. v. Leitch, 276 U. S. 429; (3) Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. v. Moser, 275 U. S. 133.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. BerkshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MoserSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. LeitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. PoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Powe v. A.C.L.R. R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Squier v. MartinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API